Comments for Matt Baker's Math Blog
https://mattbaker.blog
Thoughts on number theory, graphs, dynamical systems, tropical geometry, pedagogy, puzzles, and the p-adicsFri, 16 Feb 2018 22:17:07 +0000hourly1http://wordpress.com/Comment on The Pentagon Problem by Matt Baker
https://mattbaker.blog/2014/02/25/the-pentagon-problem/comment-page-1/#comment-1962
Fri, 16 Feb 2018 22:17:07 +0000http://mattbakerblog.wordpress.com/?p=486#comment-1962Thanks! I wasn’t aware of this reference.
]]>Comment on The Pentagon Problem by Yuval Peres
https://mattbaker.blog/2014/02/25/the-pentagon-problem/comment-page-1/#comment-1961
Fri, 16 Feb 2018 22:08:03 +0000http://mattbakerblog.wordpress.com/?p=486#comment-1961See also: Reflection Sequences
Author(s): N. Alon, I. Krasikov and Y. Peres
Source: The American Mathematical Monthly, Vol. 96, No. 9 (Nov., 1989), pp. 820-823 http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2324845.pdf?refreqid=excelsior:c910e82e0c61058fc8c67fc8448cb386
]]>Comment on The BSD conjecture is true for most elliptic curves by hxypqr
https://mattbaker.blog/2014/03/10/the-bsd-conjecture-is-true-for-most-elliptic-curves/comment-page-1/#comment-1893
Thu, 11 Jan 2018 04:30:45 +0000http://mattbakerblog.wordpress.com/?p=513#comment-1893Along this way, is it possible to establish a average version of BSD conjecture? Just like the situation of Sarnak conjecture?
]]>Comment on The Pentagon Problem by Josh Riley
https://mattbaker.blog/2014/02/25/the-pentagon-problem/comment-page-1/#comment-1876
Tue, 26 Dec 2017 17:30:11 +0000http://mattbakerblog.wordpress.com/?p=486#comment-1876This is one of my favorite math problems. Our team at Flashessay service solved it for several days. Why did I not find your article earlier?
]]>Comment on Riemann-Roch theory for graph orientations by The circuit-cocircuit reversal system | Matt Baker's Math Blog
https://mattbaker.blog/2014/01/23/riemann-roch-theory-for-graph-orientations/comment-page-1/#comment-1694
Wed, 11 Oct 2017 13:38:51 +0000http://mattbakerblog.wordpress.com/?p=405#comment-1694[…] isomorphic (as a -torsor) to the set of break divisors on ; the former is isomorphic to the circuit-cocircuit reversal system, which we now […]
]]>Comment on The Combinatorics of Break Divisors by The circuit-cocircuit reversal system | Matt Baker's Math Blog
https://mattbaker.blog/2017/09/19/the-combinatorics-of-break-divisors/comment-page-1/#comment-1693
Wed, 11 Oct 2017 12:49:06 +0000http://mattbaker.blog/?p=2170#comment-1693[…] is a finite abelian group whose cardinality is equal to the number of spanning trees of . In this earlier post, I discussed a family of combinatorial bijections between elements of and the set of spanning […]
]]>Comment on The Combinatorics of Break Divisors by The Geometry of Break Divisors | Matt Baker's Math Blog
https://mattbaker.blog/2017/09/19/the-combinatorics-of-break-divisors/comment-page-1/#comment-1660
Mon, 02 Oct 2017 16:19:31 +0000http://mattbaker.blog/?p=2170#comment-1660[…] like to continue this discussion of break divisors on graphs & tropical curves by describing an interesting connection to […]
]]>Comment on Reduced divisors and Riemann-Roch for Graphs by The Combinatorics of Break Divisors | Matt Baker's Math Blog
https://mattbaker.blog/2014/01/12/reduced-divisors-and-riemann-roch-for-graphs/comment-page-1/#comment-1617
Tue, 19 Sep 2017 22:53:45 +0000http://mattbakerblog.wordpress.com/?p=269#comment-1617[…] If we fix a vertex , the set of -reduced divisors, defined in this post, is also a collection of “nice” representatives for elements of . Whiles -reduced […]
]]>Comment on Riemann-Roch for Graphs and Applications by The Combinatorics of Break Divisors | Matt Baker's Math Blog
https://mattbaker.blog/2013/10/18/riemann-roch-for-graphs-and-applications/comment-page-1/#comment-1616
Tue, 19 Sep 2017 21:39:31 +0000http://mattbakerblog.wordpress.com/?p=112#comment-1616[…] this post I will describe some beautiful combinatorics related to the Riemann-Roch theorem for graphs. Some applications to algebraic geometry will be discussed in a follow-up […]
]]>Comment on Real Numbers and Infinite Games, Part II by Matt Baker
https://mattbaker.blog/2014/07/07/real-numbers-and-infinite-games-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-1294
Mon, 17 Apr 2017 18:48:46 +0000http://mattbakerblog.wordpress.com/?p=733#comment-1294Thank you, I had left out the word “open”. But in any case the usual formulation of the BCT is just that X itself cannot be meager (if it’s a non-empty complete metric space), so I’ve changed the statement to this.
]]>